Reference · Sourced 1996 DWAF Guideline

South African Water Quality Guidelines
Volume 4 — Agricultural Use: Irrigation

Target Water Quality Ranges and restriction bands for 28 constituents, extracted directly from the Department of Water Affairs & Forestry's 2nd-edition guideline. Includes the DWAF guideline's per-crop supporting tables (SAR/ESP tolerance, chloride tolerance, salinity tolerance) and a searchable crop lookup tool below.

Source: DWAF, 2nd Edition, 1996 Official PDF ↗
⬇ Download CWT branded PDF (9 pages)

Crop Tolerance Lookup

Search any of the 200+ crops named in the guideline's supporting tables to see every sensitivity class it falls into — sodicity (SAR/ESP), chloride (foliar and soil pathways), and general salinity tolerance (including germination-stage sensitivity). Data is reproduced from DWAF Volume 4's own Tables 2–3 for each parameter below.

Salinity — Total Dissolved Solids / Electrical Conductivity

Table 1, p.165

TDS and EC are directly related — EC is measured routinely as a proxy for TDS.

EC (mS/m at 25°C) × 6.5 = TDS (mg/L) — document's stated factor, true range 5.5–7.5 depending on ionic composition
EC (mS/m)≈ TDS (mg/L)Crop yield outcome
≤ 40≤ 260Target range — salt-sensitive crops grow with no yield decrease under low-frequency irrigation; leaching fraction up to 0.1 may be required
40 – 90260 – 58595% relative yield, moderately salt-sensitive crops, low-frequency irrigation
90 – 270585 – 1,75590% relative yield, moderately salt-tolerant crops, leaching fraction up to 0.15
270 – 5401,755 – 3,51080% relative yield — requires high-frequency irrigation, leaching fraction up to 0.2
> 540> 3,510Usable for selected crops only with sound management; sustainability drops rapidly as EC rises further

Table 2 — Relative Salt Tolerance of Various Commercial Crops at Germination (after Ayers & Westcott, 1985)

The main Salinity criteria (above) don't account for growth-stage differences — germination is markedly more salt-sensitive for some crops than the mature-plant tolerance implied by the main table. EC of the saturated soil extract causing a 50% reduction in emergence.

CropEC (mS/m) — 50% emergence reduction
Barley1 600 – 2 400 mS/m
Cotton1 550 mS/m
Sugarbeet500 – 1 250 mS/m
Sorghum1 300 mS/m
Safflower1 230 mS/m
Wheat1 400 – 1 600 mS/m
Beet, red1 380 mS/m
Lucerne820 – 1 340 mS/m
Tomato760 mS/m
Rice1 800 mS/m
Cabbage1 300 mS/m
Muskmelon1 040 mS/m
Maize2 100 – 2 400 mS/m
Lettuce1 140 mS/m
Onion560 – 750 mS/m
Bean800 mS/m

Table 3 — Commercial Crops Classified by General Salt Tolerance (After Maas, 1990 and Ayers & Westcott, 1985)

Grouped by crop family across three sub-tables (3a–3c). A fourth sub-table (grasses & forage, 3d) and the ornamental-plant table (Table 4) are dense multi-crop lists in the source and are reproduced as continuous text further below rather than split per-crop.

Table 3a — Fruit & Nut Crops

SensitiveMod. sensitiveMod. tolerantTolerantVery tolerant
Almond; Apple; Apricot; Avocado; Blackberry; Boysenberry; Cherimoya; Cherry, sweet; Cherry, sand; Currant; Gooseberry; Grapefruit; Lemon; Lime; Loquat
Mango; Orange; Passion fruit; Peach; Pear; Persimmon; Plum/prune; Pomelo; Raspberry; Rose apple; Sapote, white; Strawberry; Tangerine
Castorbean; Grape
Fig; Jujube; Olive; Papaya; Pineapple; Pomegranate
Date palm; Guayule; Jojoba

Table 3b — Vegetables

SensitiveMod. sensitiveMod. tolerantTolerant
Bean; Carrot; Okra; Onion; Parsnip; Pea
Broccoli; Brussels sprouts; Cabbage; Cauliflower; Celery; Maize, sweet; Cucumber; Eggplant; Kale; Kohlrabi; Lettuce; Muskmelon; Pepper; Potato; Pumpkin; Radish; Spinach; Squash, scallop; Sweet potato; Tomato; Turnip; Watermelon
Artichoke; Beet, red; Squash, zucchini
Asparagus

Table 3c — Fibre, Seed & Sugar Crops

SensitiveMod. sensitiveMod. tolerantTolerant
Bean; Guayule; Rice, paddy; Sesame
Broadbean; Castorbean; Maize; Flax; Millet, foxtail; Groundnut/peanut; Sugarcane; Sunflower
Cowpea; Kenaf; Oats; Safflower; Sorghum; Soybean; Wheat
Barley; Cotton; Guar; Jojoba; Rye; Sugarbeet; Triticale; Wheat, Durum

Table 3d — Grasses & Forage (reproduced as continuous text — see note)

This sub-table packs many multi-word species names per cell in the source with no per-item delimiter; boundaries below were reconstructed for readability (comma = variety/qualifier, e.g. "Clover, red" = red clover) and cross-checked against the standard Maas (1990) forage table, but individual entries were not run through the searchable lookup above out of caution — verify a specific species against the source PDF if precision matters.

SensitiveModerately sensitiveModerately tolerantTolerant
None
Alfalfa (lucerne); Bentgrass; Bluestem, Angleton; Brome, smooth; Buffelgrass; Burnet; Clover, alsike; Clover, Berseem; Clover, ladino; Clover, red; Clover, strawberry; Clover, white Dutch; Cowpea (forage); Dallis grass; Foxtail, meadow; Grama, blue; Lovegrass; Maize (forage); Milkvetch, Cicer; Oatgrass, tall; Oats (forage); Orchard grass; Rye (forage); Sesbania; Siratro; Sphaerophysa; Timothy; Trefoil, big; Vetch, common
Barley (forage); Brome, mountain; Canary grass, reed; Clover, Hubam; Clover, sweet; Fescue, meadow; Fescue, tall; Harding grass; Panic grass, blue; Rape; Rescue grass; Rhodes grass; Ryegrass, Italian; Ryegrass, perennial; Sudan grass; Trefoil, narrowleaf birdsfoot; Trefoil, broadleaf birdsfoot; Wheat (forage); Wheat, Durum (forage); Wheatgrass, standard crested; Wheatgrass, intermediate; Wheatgrass, slender; Wheatgrass, western; Wildrye, beardless; Wildrye, Canadian
Alkali grass, Nuttall; Alkali sacaton; Bermuda grass; Kallar grass; Saltgrass, desert; Wheatgrass, fairway crested; Wheatgrass, tall; Wildrye, Altai; Wildrye, Russian

Table 4 — Ornamental Shrubs, Trees & Ground Covers (After Maas, 1990 — reproduced as continuous text)

Same caveat as Table 3d above — cultivar annotations (cv. ...) reconstructed for readability, not individually searchable.

Very sensitiveSensitiveMod. sensitiveMod. tolerantTolerantVery tolerant
Star jasmine; Pyrenees cotoneaster; Oregon grape; Photinia
Pineapple guava; Chinese holly, cv. Burford; Rose, cv. Grenoble; Glossy abelia; Southern yew; Tulip tree; Algerian ivy; Japanese pittosporum; Heavenly bamboo; Chinese hibiscus; Laurustinus, cv. Robustum; Strawberry tree, cv. Compact; Crape myrtle
Glossy privet; Yellow sage; Orchid tree; Southern magnolia; Japanese boxwood; Xylosma; Japanese black pine; Indian hawthorn; Dodonaea, cv. atropurpurea; Oriental arborvitae; Thorny elaeagnus; Spreading juniper; Pyracantha, cv. Graberi; Cherry plum
Weeping bottlebrush; Oleander; European fan palm; Blue dracaena; Spindle tree, cv. Grandiflora; Rosemary; Aleppo pine; Sweet gum
Brush cherry; Ceniza; Natal plum; Evergreen pear; Bougainvillea; Italian stone pine
White iceplant; Rosea iceplant; Purple iceplant; Croceum iceplant

pH

p.127

A three-way effect — pH outside range disturbs crop yield/quality, soil nutrient availability, and irrigation equipment simultaneously.

pHCrop yield & qualitySoil / nutrient sustainabilityIrrigation equipment
< 6.5Increasing foliar damage risk when wet; possible yield/quality reductionIncreasing unavailability of micro-/macro-nutrients; some become toxicIncreasing corrosion of metal and concrete
6.5 – 8.4Target range — no foliar damage expectedNo major nutrient availability problemsMostly no corrosion/encrustation; slight-moderate drip clogging risk
> 8.4Increasing foliar damage affecting yield/visual qualityIncreasing unavailability of micro-/macro-nutrientsIncreasing pipe encrustation, drip clogging

Sodium Adsorption Ratio (SAR)

p.141 — governs sodic-soil risk, derived from Na / Ca / Mg concentrations
SAREffect (root uptake, foliage not wetted)
≤ 2.0Target range — prevents sodium toxicity in sensitive plants
2.0 – 8.0Most sodium-sensitive crops absorb toxic levels through roots
8.0 – 15.0Sodium-sensitive crops absorb toxic concentrations (varies by crop)
> 15.0All sodium-sensitive crops affected; even tolerant crops increasingly absorb toxic sodium

Table 2 — Effects on Soil Physical Conditions

SAR's effect on infiltration/hydraulic conductivity is EC-dependent — a higher irrigation-water EC offsets SAR's destabilising effect on soil structure, so each band's "problem" threshold is itself a moving EC value, not a fixed one.

SARInfiltration rateHydraulic conductivity & hardsetting
≤ 1.5Target range — adequate infiltration for sensitive soils under rainfall or irrigation with EC < 20 mS/mNo significant reduction expected for any soil
1.5 – 3.0Problems likely in sensitive soils unless irrigation EC exceeds ~20–90 mS/mNo significant reduction expected for any soil
3.0 – 6.0Problems likely unless irrigation EC exceeds ~25 mS/mReduction likely in sensitive soils; may be irreversible in low-EC soil solution; hardsetting likely below ~120 mS/m
6.0 – 12.0Problems likely unless irrigation EC exceeds ~35 mS/mReduction likely, up to a large % in sensitive soils; hardsetting likely below ~120–240 mS/m
12.0 – 20.0Problems likely unless irrigation EC exceeds ~90 mS/mReduction likely, up to <25% in less sensitive soils; hardsetting likely below ~240–400 mS/m
> 20Problems likely unless irrigation EC exceeds ~180 mS/mReduction likely, up to <25% in less sensitive soils; small reversible changes at EC 100–200 mS/m

Table 4 — Susceptibility of South African Soil Types to Physical Deterioration due to ESP–EC Interactions

General guidance only — requires modification for local rainfall/weathering and parent material; expert opinion should be sought for critical decisions.

Soil physical reactionSensitiveMediumTolerant
Infiltration rateG, I, EB, D, A, JC, F, H
Hydraulic conductivityG, F, E, IB, JA, C, H
HardsettingE, G, JI, A, BC, D, F, H

Letters refer to the South African soil groupings below (typical soil forms in each):

GroupGeneric descriptionTypical SA soil forms
AFreely drained, structureless/red structured soils, excl. sand & loamy sandHutton, Clovelly, Shortlands
BRed/yellow structureless soils with imperfectly drained plinthic horizons, excl. sandAvalon, Glencoe, Bainsvlei, Pinedene
CFreely drained sandy soilsShepstone, Lamotte, Fernwood, Dundee
DClay soils, usually dark, often swellingBonheim, Inhoek, Tambankulu, Arcadia
ESoils with a blocky structured horizonVals River, Swartland
FClay soils, often dark, imperfectly drainedRensburg, Willowbrook
GTexture-contrast soils, sandy topsoil over structured clay horizon, poorly drainedEstcourt, Sterkspruit, Kroonstad
HSoils with a humic topsoil > 2% organic carbonKranskop, Magwa, Inanda
IPoorly drained, shallow, plinthic horizon, high silt/sandWestleigh, Cartref, Longlands, Wasbank, Katspruit
JWeakly structured, somewhat poorly drainedOakleaf, Vilafonte

Table 3 — Relative Tolerance of Crops to Exchangeable Sodium Percentage (ESP)

Tolerance decreases down each column's implied order is not preserved here (crops re-sorted into class lists); tolerances are relative — nutritional and physical soil factors often limit growth before the listed ESP is reached.

2 – 15% ESP15 – 40% ESP> 40% ESP
Avocado; Deciduous Fruits; Grapes; Nuts; Beans (green); Cotton (at germination); Maize; Peas; Grapefruit; Orange; Peach; Tangerine; Mungbean; Mashbean; Lentil; Groundnut; Gram; Cowpeas
Carrot; Clover, Landino; Dallisgrass; Fescue, tall; Lettuce; Sugarcane; Berseem; Benji; Raya; Oat; Onion; Radish; Rice; Rye; Ryegrass, Italian; Sorghum; Spinach; Tomato; Vetch; Wheat
Lucerne; Barley; Beet, garden; Beet, sugar; Bermuda grass; Cotton; Paragrass; Rhodes grass; Wheatgrass, crested; Wheatgrass, fairway; Wheatgrass, tall; Karnal grass

Sodium — foliar absorption (sprinkler irrigation)

p.155
mg/LEffect
≤ 70Target range — prevents toxic accumulation even with wet foliage
70 – 115Sensitive crops: foliar injury, yield decrease
115 – 230Moderately sensitive crops affected
230 – 460Moderately tolerant crops affected
> 460Tolerant crops increasingly affected

Chloride

p.51 — two separate pathways: root absorption (surface/drip) vs. foliar absorption (sprinkler, wets foliage)
mg/LRoot absorptionFoliar absorption
≤ 100—Target range — prevents toxicity even in most sensitive plants
< 140Target range — prevents toxicity even in most sensitive plants—
100 – 175—Sensitive crops: foliar injury, yield decrease
140 – 175Slight problems—
175 – 350Some problems, moderately sensitive cropsModerately sensitive crops affected
350 – 700Most moderately sensitive/tolerant crops affectedModerately tolerant crops affected
> 700Increasing problems across crop tolerance classesTolerant crops increasingly affected

Table 2 — Relative Susceptibility of Crops to Foliar Injury from Saline Sprinkling Waters

Applies when sprinkler irrigation wets crop foliage directly; daytime sprinkling under hot/dry conditions needs more conservative criteria. Tobacco is a special case — quality (not yield) is affected by chloride above 25 mg/L even though it isn't listed in a class here.

Sensitive ≤ 175 mg/LMod. sensitive 175 – 350 mg/LMod. tolerant 350 – 700 mg/LTolerant > 700 mg/L
Almond; Apricot; Citrus; Plum; Grape
Pepper; Potato; Tomato
Barley; Maize; Cucumber; Lucerne; Safflower; Sesame; Sorghum
Cauliflower; Cotton; Sugar beet; Sunflower

Table 3 — Annual Crops Grouped into Chloride Tolerance Classes (Threshold Cl⁻ in Saturated-soil Extract)

Threshold concentrations are reproduced exactly as printed in the source table — note they don't increase strictly monotonically between the middle columns in the original document. Treat this table primarily as a relative crop ordering (per the source's own note, tolerance increases within a column) rather than as precise mg/L cut-offs; use the Chloride root/foliar table above for the authoritative concentration thresholds. * = less tolerant during emergence/seedling stage.

Sensitive ≤ 350 mg/LMod. sensitive ~425 mg/LMod. tolerant 700 – 1,200 mg/LTolerant 400 – 2,100 mg/LVery tolerant 2,450 – 2,800 mg/L
Strawberry; Bean; Onion; Carrot; Radish; Lettuce; Turnip
Pepper; Clover, strawberry; Clover, red; Clover, alsike; Clover, ladino; Corn; Flax; Potato; Sweet Potato; Broad bean; Cabbage; Foxtail, meadow; Celery; Clover, Berseem; Orchardsgrass; Sugarcane
Trefoil, big; Lovegrass; Spinach; Alfalfa; Sesbania*; Cucumber; Tomato; Broccoli; Squash, scallop; Vetch, common; Wildrye, beardless; Wheat; Sudan grass; Wheatgrass, standard crested
Beet, red; Fescue, tall; Squash, zucchini; Hardinggrass; Cowpea; Trefoil, narrowleaf bird's-foot; Ryegrass, perennial; Wheat, Durum; Barley (forage)*; Wheat
Sorghum; Bermuda grass; Sugar beet*; Wheatgrass, fairway crested; Cotton; Wheatgrass, tall; Barley*

Boron

p.35 — root uptake
mg/LEffect
≤ 0.5Target range — prevents toxicity in all but the most sensitive plants
0.5 – 1.0Very sensitive crops: foliar injury / yield decrease
1.0 – 2.0Sensitive crops affected
2.0 – 4.0Moderately sensitive crops affected
4.0 – 6.0Moderately tolerant crops affected
6.0 – 15.0Tolerant crops affected

Inorganic Nitrogen

p.119
mg/LEffect
≤ 5Target range — low enough not to affect even sensitive crops (grapes, most fruit trees); unlikely to leach to groundwater
5 – 30Sensitive crops increasingly affected; groundwater contamination risk rises with applied volume
> 30Most crops affected; severe restrictions on utilisation

Scaling / Corrosion — Langelier Saturation Index

p.131
Langelier IndexEffect
≤ −0.2Increasing problems with corrosion of metal and concrete
−0.2 to +0.2Target range — no major corrosion or scaling problem
> +0.2Increasing scaling / encrustation of pipes, drippers, openings

Aggressiveness Index (AI)

AI = pH + log₁₀(Total Alkalinity × Calcium Hardness, both as mg/L CaCO₃) — formulated for evaluating corrosion specifically in asbestos-cement pipe.

AIWater property
> 12Non-aggressive
10.0 – 11.9Moderately aggressive
≤ 10Highly aggressive

Ryznar Index (RI)

RI = 2·pHs − pHa (pHs = Langelier saturation pH, pHa = actual pH); equivalently RI = pHa − 2·LI.

RITendency
< 6.5Scale-forming tendency
> 6.5Corrosive tendency

A fourth index (Corrosion Ratio, R) is also given for chloride/sulphate-driven corrosion: R < 0.1 indicates general freedom from corrosion in neutral-to-slightly-alkaline oxygenated water.

Suspended Solids & Faecal Coliforms — drip emitter clogging

p.161 & p.71
Suspended solids (mg/L)Faecal coliforms (/100mL)Clogging outcome
≤ 50≤ 10,000Target range — practically no clogging problems
50 – 10010,000 – 50,000Slight to moderate clogging problems / likelihood
> 100> 50,000Increasingly severe / likely clogging

Trace Elements & Heavy Metals

All 17 follow the same three-tier pattern: target range → maximum for fine-textured neutral/alkaline soils → short-term, site-specific use only. Units mg/L unless noted. Most of these guidelines are explicitly marked tentative in the source document, based on comparatively limited data.

ElementTarget (≤)Intermediate bandShort-term only (>)Notes
Aluminium5.05 – 2020
Arsenic tentative0.10.1 – 2.02.0Crop Yield vs. Crop Quality detailed below
Beryllium0.100.10 – 0.50.5
Cadmium tentative0.010.01 – 0.050.05Conservative — accumulates toward food-chain toxicity
Chromium(VI) tentative0.100.10 – 1.01.0
Cobalt tentative0.050.05 – 5.05.0
Copper tentative0.20.2 – 5.05.0
Fluoride2.02.0 – 15.015.0
Iron5.05.0 – 20.020.0Foliage staining risk when wetted, not root-uptake toxic in aerated soils
Lead0.20.2 – 2.02.0
Lithium2.5——Citrus far more sensitive (~0.075 mg/L) than the general target
Manganese0.020.02 – 10.010.0
Molybdenum tentative0.010.01 – 0.050.05Animal (forage) toxicity concern, not plant
Nickel tentative0.200.20 – 2.02.0
Selenium tentative0.020.02 – 0.050.05Animal (forage) toxicity concern, not plant
Uranium0.010.01 – 0.100.10
Vanadium tentative0.100.10 – 1.01.0
Zinc tentative1.01.0 – 5.05.0

Arsenic — Crop Yield vs. Crop Quality (separate norms)

Unlike most trace elements above (collapsed to a single "effect" column), the source gives arsenic separate Crop Yield and Crop Quality criteria — both are protected by the same three-tier concentration bands, but for different reasons.

mg/LCrop YieldCrop Quality
≤ 0.1Target range. Nutrient solutions containing 0.5 – 10 mg/L have been shown to induce arsenic toxicity in some species — but only a fraction of total soil arsenic is plant-available.Yield reduction / crop failure are the main effects of arsenic-contaminated soils; arsenic generally does not accumulate in edible plant parts to levels dangerous to consumers, though root crops (potatoes, radishes) have been shown to concentrate it.
0.1 – 2.0Maximum concentration acceptable for fine-textured, neutral to alkaline soils.As above — soil accumulation, not consumer toxicity, remains the limiting concern at this level.
> 2.0Acceptable for irrigation only over the short term, on a site-specific basis.As above.